By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.
Accept
routeonerouteonerouteone
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Reading: Bus franchising must avoid return of ‘illogical’ fares boundaries
Share
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
routeonerouteone
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
© 2026 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd
- Advertisement -
routeone > Opinion > Bus franchising must avoid return of ‘illogical’ fares boundaries
Opinion

Bus franchising must avoid return of ‘illogical’ fares boundaries

The deregulated market did well with tickets that recognised travel habits, not local boundaries

Steve Warburton - Head of Operations, TAS Partnership
Steve Warburton - Head of Operations, TAS Partnership
Published: 16 March 2026
Share
Bus franchising must avoid return of 'illogical' fares boundaries
SHARE

One positive aspect of the deregulated bus system was the explosion of daily, weekly and longer-duration tickets designed around logical travel-to-work networks. Of course, they had boundaries, but largely in logical places, maybe the last stop in a built-up area or similar.

What they certainly did not do was cling to local authority boundaries, which in terms of travel patterns are often illogical, if not asinine. Many examples exist of boundaries running down the middle of roads or splitting a housing estate in two, neither of which make for a sensible ticket boundary.

Yet quite a lot of such nonsense prevailed in the 1980s. The passenger transport executives (PTEs) were innovative for their time with travelcards, but they stuck to the PTE areas. There were exceptions where PTEs’ constituent operators had ventured ‘out of county’, to use the phrase of which Merseytravel was so fond.

As fares suddenly leaped the moment the boundary was crossed, and there was no travelcard arrangement, passengers soon grasped that paying two separate fares was cheaper, and they frequently did. So no, the railway did not pioneer split ticketing!

I followed a blog recently that started with ‘puzzled of Bacup’ asking why there was a Bee AnyBus ticket that is not valid on any bus – just those heading south. Someone told them it is because the ticket is a Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) product.

“But why is TfGM selling tickets here? We are in Lancashire!” came the response. At which point, another ‘helper’ explained that it was because in 1969, when the SELNEC PTE was formed, Rochdale Corporation bus services ran as far as Bacup.

At that point the thread got very geeky very quickly. But we do that, confuse Joe Public, who then probably reaches for the Uber app.

Franchising has the danger of returning to these artificial boundaries. Over in St Helens, the Liverpool City Region (LCR) bus franchise will take over from Arriva’s operations very soon. Arriva’s tickets include Wigan and Warrington. The Wigan service is in the franchise but Warrington is not. So who ensures continuation of through ticket validity?

My feeling is probably nobody, or maybe the LCR ticket will be valid on the Wigan service and not to Warrington. It does not make for a happy situation, and nor does it make sense to passengers. It would be a shame to knock the shine off a new start with negative publicity.

Franchising guidance suggests protection of cross-boundary travellers is put in place, but I worry it is just warm words that will not be followed through.

TAGGED:boundariesBus franchisingfaresSteve WarburtonTAStickets
Share This Article
Facebook LinkedIn Threads Email Copy Link
Previous Article The cleanest, lowest pollution transit mode we have: light rail
Next Article The Hairy Coo introduces a CMS-equipped Yutong GT12 coach The Hairy Coo introduces a CMS-equipped Yutong GT12 coach
- Advertisement -

Latest News

Unite in 'full support' for bus drivers that refuse extreme cab heat
Unite gives ‘full support’ to bus drivers who refuse extreme cab heat
News
Route Robin Rapid features updates for faster rail replacement deployment
Suppliers
rail replacement coach peterborough
Early action urged on £1.85m rail replacement accessibility grant
News
Rail replacement PSVAIR compliance needs temporary transition arrangement, says IT9
Rail replacement PSVAIR compliance ‘needs temporary transition’
News
- Advertisement -

routeone magazine is the indispensable resource for professional UK coach, bus and minibus operators. The home of vehicle sales and the latest bus and coach job vacancies, routeone connects professional PCV operators with complete and unrivalled news coverage.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • GDPR Policy
  • Sustainability
  • Advertise
  • Latest Issue
  • Share Your News
routeonerouteone
Follow US
© 2026 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd