By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.
Accept
routeonerouteonerouteone
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Reading: Clean air zone or stealth tax?
Share
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
routeonerouteone
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
© 2026 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd
- Advertisement -
routeone > Readers' Letters > Clean air zone or stealth tax?
Readers' Letters

Clean air zone or stealth tax?

routeone Team
Published: 22 October 2018
Share
SHARE

I am all for clean air [zones], but I think that certain cities are using it as a stealth tax.

The Mayor of London, Sadiq Kahn, has bought the programme forward for Euro 6, which is fine providing it is Euro 6 and not a way to put a tariff on and collect penalties from drivers; this is not what the clean air [zone] is all about.

It is being marketed as a life-threatening problem in our cities, so does taking a £200 fee reduce this risk or just swell the coffers of the cities concerned?

We know there is technology out there available to upgrade polluting vehicles, but Brexit government establishments are coming up with unfounded reasons to obstruct retrofitting to vehicles.

Coach operators are struggling enough without the added uncertainty of how they are going to operate their fleet after March 2019.

It will take a government years to put in a programme of upgrades etc. and finance it – why do they expect coach operators to do it in a matter of months?

Bob Turnock

Managing Director

RWT Commercial Services

TAGGED:BusCoachDiversified CommunicationsMagazineMiniPlusrouteONE
Share This Article
Facebook LinkedIn Threads Email Copy Link
Previous Article Two finalists for top honours
Next Article Coach firm helps home town school
- Advertisement -

Latest News

Arriva bus depot colleagues set for Yorkshire Air Ambulance charity walk
Arriva bus depot staff set for Yorkshire Air Ambulance charity walk
People
Unfolding NEET disaster: coach and bus is part of the solution
Unfolding NEET disaster: coach and bus is part of the solution
Editor's Comment
Consider the passenger when measuring bus network performance
Bus network performance: passenger experience is the lead factor
Opinion
Kleandrive sold out of administration to Palmer Energy Technology
Kleandrive sold out of administration to Palmer Energy Technology
Suppliers
- Advertisement -

routeone magazine is the indispensable resource for professional UK coach, bus and minibus operators. The home of vehicle sales and the latest bus and coach job vacancies, routeone connects professional PCV operators with complete and unrivalled news coverage.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • GDPR Policy
  • Sustainability
  • Advertise
  • Latest Issue
  • Share Your News
routeonerouteone
Follow US
© 2026 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd