By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.
Accept
routeonerouteonerouteone
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Reading: ‘RE the Supreme Court decision’
Share
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
routeonerouteone
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
© 2026 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd
- Advertisement -
routeone > Readers' Letters > ‘RE the Supreme Court decision’
Readers' Letters

‘RE the Supreme Court decision’

routeone Team
Published: 30 January 2017
Share
SHARE

Very interested in the Supreme Court wheelchair decision. Basically we cannot 'politely' ask a baby buggy user to vacate the wheelchair space when a wheelchair user appears at a later stop.

‘Who now has priority?’

How would routeone or readers advise a driver if the wheelchair bay is already occupied by a chair user and, at subsequent stops, another one or two wheelchair users and a passenger with a baby buggy were wishing to board. Who now has priority or rights?

If there are, say, 25 empty 'normal' passenger seats but a wish by two or even three wheelchair users to board, what action must the driver take? He has a mostly empty bus but his wheelchair space is occupied. Should he refuse access to his bus to the intending wheelchair users at the later stops? And what are the 'rights' of those passengers if they are refused permission to ride?

Sam Samuelson

Bromsgrove

Worcestershire

TAGGED:BusCoachDiversified CommunicationsMagazineMiniPlusrouteONE
Share This Article
Facebook LinkedIn Threads Email Copy Link
Previous Article Carmel Coaches wins O-Licence
Next Article ‘More intrigue than the Matrix trilogy…’
- Advertisement -

Latest News

Arriva bus depot colleagues set for Yorkshire Air Ambulance charity walk
Arriva bus depot staff set for Yorkshire Air Ambulance charity walk
People
Unfolding NEET disaster: coach and bus is part of the solution
Unfolding NEET disaster: coach and bus is part of the solution
Editor's Comment
Consider the passenger when measuring bus network performance
Bus network performance: passenger experience is the lead factor
Opinion
Kleandrive sold out of administration to Palmer Energy Technology
Kleandrive sold out of administration to Palmer Energy Technology
Suppliers
- Advertisement -

routeone magazine is the indispensable resource for professional UK coach, bus and minibus operators. The home of vehicle sales and the latest bus and coach job vacancies, routeone connects professional PCV operators with complete and unrivalled news coverage.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • GDPR Policy
  • Sustainability
  • Advertise
  • Latest Issue
  • Share Your News
routeonerouteone
Follow US
© 2026 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd