By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.
Accept
routeonerouteonerouteone
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Reading: Operator given time to submit new licence application
Share
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
routeonerouteone
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
© 2026 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd
- Advertisement -
routeone > News > Operator given time to submit new licence application
News

Operator given time to submit new licence application

routeone Team
Published: 17 December 2018
Share
SHARE

TC issues a number of undertakings to South Shields operator who ‘didn’t know he’d done anything wrong’

South Shields-based William Harker, who told Traffic Commissioner (TC) Tim Blackmore than he hadn’t done anything wrong, has had his licence cut to three vehicles plus a direction that it be revoked at the end of February, giving time for the submission of a new licence application in the name of a partnership. 

In addition, the TC required a number of undertakings including that Mr Harker be replaced as Transport Manager (TM) by his son Jason within seven days.

Mr Harker, trading as Harker’s Coaches with an eight-vehicle international licence, had been called before the TC at a Leeds Public Inquiry (PI).

After financial evidence was heard in private, the TC said that there was an entity issue and it would be necessary for an application for a new licence. He gave the family a period of grace until the end of February to show the required financial standing.

Mr Harker said that they were only operating three old vehicles doing school work and a limited amount of private hire. He and his son were the only drivers. They did not send the tachograph charts away for analysis as they were only a small firm not making enough money.

The TC pointed out that it was a requirement of the licence to have a system in place to monitor drivers’ hours that could be demonstrated to DVSA that it was effective. They had also failed to produce tachograph records when requested to do so, only producing them to Gosforth test centre in the build-up to the PI.

During a maintenance investigation in July, the Vehicle Examiner (VE) reported that the four-weekly interval between inspections had been exceeded, with the vehicles being inspected at eight-weekly intervals, with one vehicle going 17 weeks between inspections.

Mr Harker said that the four-weekly interval had been declared in 1973 when he started operating. The vehicles were only doing a small mileage and his son had wanted to have a longer inspection period. The vehicle with the 17-week interval had been off the road. They now had a forward planner, a driver defect reporting system and an up-to-date inspection sheet. They could not afford to buy a new vehicle.

The TC commented that with 30-year-old vehicles he felt that a four-week inspection interval was appropriate. After he said that the defect reports produced did not list any defects, Jason Harker said that there was hardly ever anything wrong.

William Harker, who had acquired his Transport Manager qualification through acquired rights, admitted that he had not done any refresher training. He had said to the VE that he was not doing anything wrong and didn’t know why he was being called to a PI.

The TC said that the licence had been in the wrong entity from the outset. It was an ostensibly safe operation, but the systems were out of date or not there at all.

TAGGED:BusCoachDiversified CommunicationsMagazineMiniPlusrouteONE
Share This Article
Facebook LinkedIn Threads Email Copy Link
Previous Article What does 2019 hold for the coach industry?
Next Article Revocation and licence refusal for ‘fronting’
- Advertisement -

Latest News

PC Coaches underlines SME important to future of bus networks
PC Coaches underlines importance of SMEs to rural bus future
News
Clear favour for electric over diesel from drivers, VEV survey finds
Drivers favour electric coach and bus over diesel, VEV survey finds
News
RHA claims repeat recognition at SME4Labour Excellence Awards
RHA claims repeat recognition at SME4Labour Excellence Awards
News
Sailun prepares to bring all-position coach-specific tyre to market
Sailun prepares to bring all-position coach-specific tyre to market
Suppliers
- Advertisement -

routeone magazine is the indispensable resource for professional UK coach, bus and minibus operators. The home of vehicle sales and the latest bus and coach job vacancies, routeone connects professional PCV operators with complete and unrivalled news coverage.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • GDPR Policy
  • Sustainability
  • Advertise
  • Latest Issue
  • Share Your News
routeonerouteone
Follow US
© 2026 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd