By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.
Accept
routeonerouteonerouteone
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo 2024
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • Livery Competition
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Search
© 2024 routeone News. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Housing expansion target could be to disbenefit of bus services
Share
Font ResizerAa
routeonerouteone
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo 2024
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • Livery Competition
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Follow US
© 2024 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd
- Advertisement -
-
routeone > Features > Housing expansion target could be to disbenefit of bus services
Features

Housing expansion target could be to disbenefit of bus services

Sustainable transport aims could be sacrificed amid the desperation to build new homes. How can operators ensure bus is a part of the grand plan?

Paul Halford
Paul Halford
Published: October 20, 2024
Share
Bus services for new developments need to offer a good alternative to the car from day one
Bus services for new developments need to offer a good alternative to the car from day one
SHARE

As the government plans to build 1.5 million homes in England within the next five years, concerns have been expressed this will help fuel a car-dependent culture as more new developments are created without adequate transport links.

Contents
‘New approach’ neededThe trouble with Section 106CPT responseDRT not seen as the answerOperators’ role

Such a bold housebuilding target is welcomed in many quarters. However, preventative action is required if achieving it is not to come at the expense of aims to enhance sustainable transport, it has been claimed.

The new administration hopes to have allayed concerns with proposed revisions to the National Planning Policy Framework, which were out for consultation until last month.

However, while some aspects of the changes were welcomed, they did little to quash fears that an upsurge in new mini-conurbations connected only by roads will not have a detrimental effect on the bus sector in the long term.

Campaigning group Transport for New Homes (TfNH) welcomed the document’s guarantees of infrastructure development for the green belt or newly termed “grey belt” areas, which make up around 12% of the land nationwide.

However, it points out that a very small proportion of new development will take place on land with this designation. It wants those guarantees applied to all greenfield land, of which 91% of the UK is made up.

TfNH has long campaigned against the proliferation of car-dependent housing estates built away from jobs and other vital services which, especially without good transport, increase traffic and congestion.

Its Director, Steve Chambers, points out a perceived positive in the NPPF reforms that, when it comes to infrastructure guarantees, the proposals cover green belt area rather than only the earlier mooted “new towns”.

He says: “At first glance, it looks really good, but the reality is, even if they were to achieve their housing targets, relatively little of that would be on green belt so this NPPF update, taken as a whole, the good bit just won’t apply. We think that’s the basic problem.”

National Planning Policy Framework changes give assurances over green and ‘grey’ belt areas, but these may not affect the bigger picture
National Planning Policy Framework changes give assurances over green and ‘grey’ belt areas, but these may not affect the bigger picture

He adds that the document is written in such a way that it is easy to circumvent planning guidelines.

“It’s a bit like the Bible — you can easily find a passage to agree with your view,” he says. “It sounds good but, if there are other parts of the NPPF that can be used to nullify them, there’s not much point it being there.”

‘New approach’ needed

Turning his attentions away from the NPPF, Steve adds: “We also think more generally that a new approach is needed. The locations that are chosen for housing at the moment are poor locations for a whole range of reasons.

“We think this will just continue that.” TfNH is soon to publish a “state of the nation” report into the current situation and Steve says the early indications are that it will show a worsening situation due partly to cuts overall to bus services.

One prominent bus figure who is fighting the corner of sustainable transport’s place in future building is Ben Colson, who is a former Chair of both ALBUM and Bus Users UK. The founder of Norfolk Green, which was bought by Stagecoach, talks of a “disconnect” between the Department for Transport and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.

The locations that are chosen for housing at the moment are poor locations for a whole range of reasons. We think this will just continue that – Steve Chambers

He adds: “The structure of government says that transport falls to the local transport authority — and they are higher-tier authority, yet planning policy and even parking policy fall to the lower tier, the local planning authority. You immediately have a disconnect that is baked in as a result of years or decades of government policy and practice. Planning and transport need to be brought together.”

The trouble with Section 106

“Section 106” obligations, where a developer must pay for facilities such as bus services, are designed to combat the problem.

However, these only come into force when a certain number of residents are in situ, by which time hundreds of people could have decided to rely on cars due to a lack of public transport. Even if buses are in place, if they are not frequent enough, they do not solve the issue.

Steve says: “What we notice again and again, even the few good examples — one good example is Bicester Eco Village — they had money for a bus route, but they did it every half an hour from day one and then went up to 15 minutes once they had so many people.

“That [instead] needed to be 15 minutes from day one because that frequency wasn’t good enough for them, so they were driving.”

Operators … have got to open lines of communication directly with the local planning authority. They’ve got to be talking to them so that they also understand that there are implications and outcomes – Ben Colson

Ben has similarly seen both bad and a few good examples of transport planning across the country. He says: “I can think of two in Andover, where you’ve got significant new developments away from the central area and away from the local railway station, even though in both cases the railway passes very close by. And yet they are almost entirely car-dependent.

“Then you can look at others on the other side of the coin, like the big new development on the outskirts of Exeter, which actually has a completely new railway station associated with it on the Waterloo to Exeter line and there are bus services going there.”

Ben uses the example of his own locality in Norfolk to illustrate a problem with the proposed NPPF revisions. “In the latest changes is [the move] to reduce the amount of development in major urban centres and scatter it more across the country.

“The area I live, most of it is purely rural, no shops, nothing. We’ve got to have — compared to the last government’s house-building targets for this area — a mandatory target of 88%. In an area where there are no extra jobs coming.

“That means people have to travel further to get to work, health services, education, retail and, therefore, you’re actually moving people away from where job creation is greatest — the city regions.”

CPT response

The Confederation of Passenger Transport (CPT), in its response to the consultation, called for a “bus-first” approach within the framework.

Alison Edwards, CPT Director of Policy and External Relations, says: “Only a ‘bus-first’ approach enshrined in the framework will ensure that the planning system delivers new towns and housing developments without further embedding car-dependency.

“Placemaking with ‘bus first’ will persuade more people to use buses — delivering healthier, greener, and better-connected communities.”

Among the calls, CPT says developers should “design proposals to meet housing and infrastructure needs with bus infrastructure already integrated as an immovable part of the plan”, “design future road use proposals with buses and coaches prioritised” and restrict parking to promote public transport use.

It says planning authorities and local governments should bring bus operators into discussions at the earliest opportunity and “remain cognisant of the need to provide improved bus and coach infrastructure in already existing developments and urban areas”. It also notes a shortfall in Section 106 as a solution, “where the agreements are overly prescriptive”, particularly with regards to establishing a bus route for insufficient time for it to be commercially viable.

DRT not seen as the answer

Demand-responsive transport (DRT) has worked as a solution for some new developments. However, both Steve and Ben agree that any benefits of DRT are not specific to reducing car-dependency.

“DRT does not and never will, in my opinion, provide a viable strategic alternative to the car for a journey to work,” says Ben.

Steve adds on this: “In some places, DRT has led to a fixed route being put in, which is great. So, there is a role there in the early stages of building for showing demand. But it’s very rare that we’ve seen a pattern of development that actually suits DRT. It definitely isn’t a cure-all.”

The move towards franchised services and local authorities having direct responsibility for bus services may not substantially change the outlook either. Steve says: “The places that are best-positioned to take advantage of franchising [such as the big cities] aren’t the places where we’re building new homes.”

Operators’ role

Regardless of how local planning reforms pan out, bus operators need not just accept the status quo, highlight Ben and Steve.

Communication is seen to be key and Ben says it has to be appropriately directed: “Operators tend to talk to their local transport authority and that’s understandable.

“They’ve got to open lines of communication directly with the local planning authority. They’ve got to be talking to them so that they also understand that there are implications and outcomes and, therefore, they can start planning in positive rather than negative outcomes from the outset.

For bus routes to be part of the equation, operators are advised to get involved early on in the planning process
For bus routes to be part of the equation, operators are advised to get involved early on in the planning process

“If you look at, not only this issue of the NPPF but also the previous three, they also say that quality public transport must be planned in from the outset; the only way we can achieve that is by operators talking directly to the local planning authorities and not presuming that the local transport authorities, that higher-tier authority, will do it on their behalf.”

For Steve, it is early communication that is particularly important. “Operators need to get involved in the local planning consultations as early as possible. When we’re planning new houses, we need to have them in places where it’s useful for routes and that’s where bus operators come in, because they know what is a viable pattern to run a route and that needs to be fed in at the earliest possible stage.”

 

 

 

Share This Article
Facebook LinkedIn Threads Email Copy Link
Previous Article Towns like Blackpool exemplify the support for coach services that we would like to see across the UK Celebrating the value of the coach sector and its passengers
Next Article When contracts are awarded in the public sector, unsuccessful bidders have a right to learn of the rationale behind the decision Legal Q&A: Contract bidding and sexual harassment
- Advertisement -

Latest News

Mercedes-Benz Tourismo for Clynnog and Trefor
Clynnog and Trefor welcomes another Mercedes-Benz Tourismo
Deliveries
Temsa HD12 and HD13 delivered to Cresta Coaches under Asset Alliance rental deal
Temsa pair join Cresta Coaches on Asset Alliance rental agreement
Deliveries
Go-Ahead London – Managing Director
Careers Jobs
andy burnham tfgm £15.6 billion (1) The funding announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves today (4 June) has been allocated to several combined mayoral authorities to use on rail, tram, road and bus infrastructure. Transport for Greater Manchester revealed today that part of the £2.5 billion it will receive will go towards making the Bee Network fully battery-electric by 2030. An as-yet undecided portion of that will support a planned investment in 1,000 new zero-emission buses over that period, the mayoral authority said. That is part of plans to build the UK's "first fully integrated, zero-emission public transport system", with trams and trains also set to benefit. Liverpool City Region's already announced BRT system is among the projects to which its £1.6 billion will be allocated. Under those plans - due for realisation by 2028 - a high-speed network will be served by articulated buses which are modelled on the 'Glider' in Belfast. It is due to link Liverpool city centre with John Lennon Airport, and Liverpool FC and Everton FC's respective stadia along three routes. Although the model of bus has not been confirmed, a Van Hool Exqui.City on loan from Belfast was last year used as a demonstrator. That 18m vehicle can accommodate around 30% more passengers than a typical bus and has three sets of double doors. The funding will also go towards buses elsewhere in the city as the region heads towards franchising services by 2027. Liverpool Mayor Steve Rotheram with a 'Glider' which was on loan from Belfast last year - an example of the sort of bus which could serve the new BRT Bus services in the East Midlands region will be boosted by the funding, thanks to the £2 billion handed to it today by the government. Some of that allocation will be used for a rapid transit network on the Trent Arc between Nottingham and Derby. Between the two cities, the Freeport, Infinity Park Investment Zone and Ratcliffe-on-Soar will also benefit from the improved bus services. South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority's newly announced commitment towards bus franchising has been boosted by £350 million in funding as part of that region's allocation. The funding for West Yorkshire will help build new bus stations in Bradford and Wakefield. Likewise, the Tees Valley Mayoral Authority will put its sum towards a new £15 million bus station in Middlesbrough. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander says: "Today marks a watershed moment on our journey to improving transport across the North and Midlands – opening up access to jobs, growing the economy and driving up quality of life as we deliver our Plan for Change. "For too long, people in the North and Midlands have been locked out of the investment they deserve. With £15.6bn of government investment, we’re giving local leaders the means to drive cities, towns and communities forward, investing in Britain’s renewal so you and your family are better off."
TfGM’s all-electric bus plan boosted by new £15.6 billion package
News
- Advertisement -
-

routeone magazine is the indispensable resource for professional UK coach, bus and minibus operators. The home of vehicle sales and the latest bus and coach job vacancies, routeone connects professional PCV operators with complete and unrivalled news coverage.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • GDPR Policy
  • Sustainability
  • Advertise
  • Latest Issue
  • Share Your News
routeonerouteone
Follow US
© 2024 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd