By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.
Accept
routeonerouteonerouteone
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo 2024
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • Livery Competition
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Search
© 2024 routeone News. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: ‘How does coach strategy fit into a sector private to its core?’
Share
Font ResizerAa
routeonerouteone
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo 2024
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • Livery Competition
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Follow US
© 2024 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd
- Advertisement -
-
routeone > Opinion > ‘How does coach strategy fit into a sector private to its core?’
OpinionPolitics

‘How does coach strategy fit into a sector private to its core?’

Westminster Watcher
Westminster Watcher
Published: April 19, 2021
Share
CPT coach strategy Westminster Watch
SHARE

The publication in March of a coach strategy – Backing Britain’s Coaches – by the Confederation of Passenger Transport (CPT) might be seen by many as being long overdue. CPT itself acknowledged that this was the first time it has produced a strategy for the coach sector, despite being its trade association for a very long time.

Contents
Coach strategy makes ‘some highly compelling arguments’One question is raised by the coach strategy…Coach industry is ‘private sector to its core’Take the King’s shilling but expect conditionsDoes more government involvement lead to a loss of control?

But as regular readers of this column will know, I am nervous about strategies, especially when they call for government financial support for a sector that is meant to be – and in this case, has long been – commercial.

Coach strategy makes ‘some highly compelling arguments’

Of course, COVID-19 has changed the dynamic of that argument to a very considerable extent. After all, private companies up and down the country have received financial support in one form or another over the past year, and rightly so as the pandemic shut down business in an unprecedented way through no fault of those companies.

But those businesses have not produced strategies that call for government support on a longer-term basis. Most of those companies will bounce back over time and get back to a normal trading relationship with their customers. I don’t detect that ambition in CPT’s coach strategy.

Don’t get me wrong: CPT’s document makes some highly compelling arguments as to why more direct and sustained government support for the coach sector is a good thing from a public policy point of view. It is a well-argued and coherent piece of work. I found myself agreeing with much of what it says, not least because a lot of the support that is called for is not simply financial.

One question is raised by the coach strategy…

But I kept on finding myself asking one basic question: Why is it that the trade association representing the coach industry has not found it necessary to produce a coach strategy before now?

CPT coach strategy
Our commentator wonders whether the lack of a clearly-defined coach strategy until now has actually been to the industry’s detriment

What is it about the dynamic of the coach sector that has meant that, for decades, there has been no overt government support, no government- or industry-backed strategy – a situation that, to my knowledge, nobody has ever complained about?

This is surely, deep down, a tacit recognition that the coach industry is a private sector operation through and through.

For sure, there are public policy benefits from people using the coach over the car. But are those benefits driven by major public policy agendas in the same way as they are for the bus sector?

Coach industry is ‘private sector to its core’

As I say, a significant proportion of the market for the coach sector is private to its core, whether that is people travelling by coach on holiday, on a trip to a sporting or leisure event, and so on. That is a completely different market to the one served by the bus industry. But yes, the coach sector certainly provides services for schools and rail replacement provision for which operators get paid – ultimately – by the taxpayer, and rightly so.

I absolutely understand many of the points raised by CPT in its coach strategy. They are well made. But at the heart of my concern is a simple, basic truth: If a company or a sector wants government support, it will come with strings attached.

Take the King’s shilling but expect conditions

In the case of the CPT document, the immediate call is for between £100-150m of funding. This is not just a request for policy guidance to local authorities to provide appropriate levels of coach parking facilities in their planning decisions, but a call for direct government subsidy. Yet the coach industry is a private, commercially based sector and, as I say, to my knowledge nobody has ever questioned that.

No doubt there are plenty of examples to demonstrate that across the private sector, companies regularly secure government support in one form or another. I accept that my point thus far is a touch ‘black and white’.

But here is the real core of my point: Call for government support in financial terms by all means, and that may have a very strong justification given the new world in which we operate. But take caution that if you take the king’s shilling, you will have conditions attached to your business operation.

Does more government involvement lead to a loss of control?

I voiced concern over CPT’s support for a National Bus Strategy for England as I suggested that this would result in bus operators losing a large degree of control over their businesses. I feat that is exactly what has happened. If the coach industry wants a coach strategy, and wants government support – especially funding – then is it willing to lose some control over how its sector functions?

I am sure that I will be told that the dynamics of the coach and bus sectors are fundamentally different, and that they serve different markets. I understand and recognise that. I understand that the issues are much more complex than I am making out.

There absolutely needs to be a recognition of the value and role of the coach sector in meeting various public policy goals. That recognition has been lacking. The CPT strategy makes some powerful public policy points. But I think that the coach industry needs to be careful what it asks for, and I ask myself whether the previous absence of a formal coach strategy has actually been detrimental to the interests of the industry when all things are considered.

The coach sector has been hit hard by COVID-19, so I understand why the strategy has emerged. I just urge a degree of caution.

Share This Article
Facebook LinkedIn Threads Email Copy Link
Previous Article Work ramps up for CPT as the economy starts again
Next Article Westminster language towards coaches has hardened in 2021 Hardened Westminster language towards coaches: What for?
- Advertisement -

Latest News

Temsa HD12 and HD13 delivered to Cresta Coaches under Asset Alliance rental deal
Temsa pair join Cresta Coaches on Asset Alliance rental agreement
Deliveries
Go-Ahead London – Managing Director
Careers Jobs
andy burnham tfgm £15.6 billion (1) The funding announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves today (4 June) has been allocated to several combined mayoral authorities to use on rail, tram, road and bus infrastructure. Transport for Greater Manchester revealed today that part of the £2.5 billion it will receive will go towards making the Bee Network fully battery-electric by 2030. An as-yet undecided portion of that will support a planned investment in 1,000 new zero-emission buses over that period, the mayoral authority said. That is part of plans to build the UK's "first fully integrated, zero-emission public transport system", with trams and trains also set to benefit. Liverpool City Region's already announced BRT system is among the projects to which its £1.6 billion will be allocated. Under those plans - due for realisation by 2028 - a high-speed network will be served by articulated buses which are modelled on the 'Glider' in Belfast. It is due to link Liverpool city centre with John Lennon Airport, and Liverpool FC and Everton FC's respective stadia along three routes. Although the model of bus has not been confirmed, a Van Hool Exqui.City on loan from Belfast was last year used as a demonstrator. That 18m vehicle can accommodate around 30% more passengers than a typical bus and has three sets of double doors. The funding will also go towards buses elsewhere in the city as the region heads towards franchising services by 2027. Liverpool Mayor Steve Rotheram with a 'Glider' which was on loan from Belfast last year - an example of the sort of bus which could serve the new BRT Bus services in the East Midlands region will be boosted by the funding, thanks to the £2 billion handed to it today by the government. Some of that allocation will be used for a rapid transit network on the Trent Arc between Nottingham and Derby. Between the two cities, the Freeport, Infinity Park Investment Zone and Ratcliffe-on-Soar will also benefit from the improved bus services. South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority's newly announced commitment towards bus franchising has been boosted by £350 million in funding as part of that region's allocation. The funding for West Yorkshire will help build new bus stations in Bradford and Wakefield. Likewise, the Tees Valley Mayoral Authority will put its sum towards a new £15 million bus station in Middlesbrough. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander says: "Today marks a watershed moment on our journey to improving transport across the North and Midlands – opening up access to jobs, growing the economy and driving up quality of life as we deliver our Plan for Change. "For too long, people in the North and Midlands have been locked out of the investment they deserve. With £15.6bn of government investment, we’re giving local leaders the means to drive cities, towns and communities forward, investing in Britain’s renewal so you and your family are better off."
TfGM’s all-electric bus plan boosted by new £15.6 billion package
News
Local Transport Minister opens First Bus electric depot in Hengrove
Local Transport Minister opens First Bus electric depot in Hengrove
Bus
- Advertisement -
-

routeone magazine is the indispensable resource for professional UK coach, bus and minibus operators. The home of vehicle sales and the latest bus and coach job vacancies, routeone connects professional PCV operators with complete and unrivalled news coverage.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • GDPR Policy
  • Sustainability
  • Advertise
  • Latest Issue
  • Share Your News
routeonerouteone
Follow US
© 2024 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd