By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.
Accept
routeonerouteonerouteone
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo 2024
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • Livery Competition
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Search
© 2024 routeone News. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Landmark case on ‘small vehicle’ use – decision awaited
Share
Font ResizerAa
routeonerouteone
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo 2024
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • Livery Competition
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Follow US
© 2024 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd
- Advertisement -
-
routeone > Legal > Landmark case on ‘small vehicle’ use – decision awaited
Legal

Landmark case on ‘small vehicle’ use – decision awaited

Tim Deakin
Tim Deakin
Published: December 7, 2018
Share
SHARE

In a landmark case, the lawfulness of the small vehicle conditions – those with eight or fewer passenger seats – imposed on PSV O-licences is to be decided by Deputy Traffic Commissioner (DTC) Anthony Seculer in a case brought against Burnley-based Althams Travel Service.

The company with a 20-vehicle international licence, was called before the DTC because of concerns that its use of small vehicles to carry passengers to airports and cruise ships did not fall within the conditions.

For the company, James Backhouse argued that it was a commercial business operating vehicles at separate fares that were arranged by the company. That meant that an O-Licence was required. Each vehicle often collected people from more than one booking. To use the service, people had to have booked a holiday through the company.

The DTC said that wider advertisement to the public was not part of the arrangement. Essentially there were private bookings coming together to share, rather than being advertised to the public.

Mr Backhouse said he did not accept members of the public were not people who booked holidays with the company. He argued that it did not matter whether the journeys were advertised to the public or not, because as the company arranges the journeys, brought the passengers together and charged separate fares, an O-Licence was required. It was the only way the journeys could be operated.

The DTC said that the remedy might be to operate larger vehicles.

After the DTC had said that in the 2014 case of James Fleming, a strikingly similar case, the Upper Tribunal accepted the legal position as expressed by the TC.

Mr Backhouse argued that Tribunal decisions did not bind TCs, and the point that the conditions could be unlawful was not argued before the Tribunal.

Mr Backhouse pointed out that as the licence was granted prior to 2010, there were no conditions, so the company could not be in breach of them.

After the DTC referred to a letter sent to all operators in 2010 requiring them to meet the terms of the conditions, Mr Backhouse said that he did not accept that that letter was binding on operators.

MD Sandra McAllister said that Althans had never intended to operate outside the law.

The DTC said he had seen nothing to suggest otherwise. He did not see any evidence of a breach of faith by the company in the way the small vehicles were operated. He is to announce his decision in writing at a later date.

Share This Article
Facebook LinkedIn Threads Email Copy Link
ByTim Deakin
Tim is Editor of routeone and has worked in both the coach and bus and haulage industries.
Previous Article 38-passenger extended, uprated Sprinter in 2019
Next Article Driver killed at Chester Zoo’s coach park by falling bus
- Advertisement -

Latest News

traffic coach bus streetworks road works
Coach and bus traffic woes: A fix is urgently required
Opinion
Navigating the road to O-Licence compliance
Navigating the road to O-Licence compliance
Features
Stagecoach’s zero-emission depot in Stockton: Blueprint for the group’s transition?
News
Coaches make a major contribution to the economy – and that should be recognised
National Coach Week: A chance to make a political case
Opinion
- Advertisement -
-

routeone magazine is the indispensable resource for professional UK coach, bus and minibus operators. The home of vehicle sales and the latest bus and coach job vacancies, routeone connects professional PCV operators with complete and unrivalled news coverage.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • GDPR Policy
  • Sustainability
  • Advertise
  • Latest Issue
  • Share Your News
routeonerouteone
Follow US
© 2024 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd