By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.
Accept
routeonerouteonerouteone
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo 2024
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • Livery Competition
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Search
© 2024 routeone News. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Edinburgh tram ‘should not have been signed’
Share
Font ResizerAa
routeonerouteone
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo 2024
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • Livery Competition
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Follow US
© 2024 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd
- Advertisement -
-
routeone > Operators > Edinburgh tram ‘should not have been signed’
Operators

Edinburgh tram ‘should not have been signed’

routeone Team
routeone Team
Published: June 11, 2018
Share
SHARE

A Public Inquiry into cost over-runs in the £776m Edinburgh Tram project has heard that the construction contract was an “extremely poor deal for the council” and “should never have been signed as it allowed the contractor to hold the council to ransom.”

The inquiry, which has so far cost £9m, is trying to establish why the original £375m estimate rose to £521m at contract signing, and then £776m to complete a cut-back scheme.

Lawyer Douglas Fairley, representing the council’s wholly-owned project  company Transport Initiatives Edinburgh (TIE), added that the financial information contained in the contract was confusing and that the wording "encouraged disputes”.

It has also come to light that there ‘may’ have been a number of errors of judgement, which Mr Fairley accepted saying that such situations had come about as a result of “extreme difficulty created by others who either preceded them or in some cases were senior to them within the organisation”, adding that “nowhere was this more so than in the context of the contract.”

Referring specifically to the arrangements between the Council and the contractor, Mr Fairley said: “It was a terrible contract for TIE and, by extension, a terrible contract for City of Edinburgh Council.”

He also said: "It would be fair to say that any contract which left the door open to an argument by the contractor that something as basic and fundamental as the employer's requirements for the construction of the tram network was an extra over and above that which had been priced was an extremely poor deal for the council."

Earlier in the inquiry, the main contractor said that work to deal with utilities in the ground was a critical factor that delayed the tram project.

Garry Borland, of Bilfinger Construction UK, said that work on moving ground utilities, over which they had no control, was “very far from complete” when the contract between TIE and the infrastructure consortium was being concluded, adding that the utility work should have been completed before 2008, but was finished years late.

By December 2007, around 40% of the detailed design work was lacking.

The high-political project was originally going to be a multi-line network from Edinburgh Airport, via Princes Street to Ocean Terminal. Due to delays and cost overruns, the Ocean Terminal line was cancelled, truncating it to an 8.7-mile line, that opened, three years late, in May 2014. Its construction was heavily opposed by the Scottish National Party, but backed by then Labour-run council

TAGGED:BusCoachDiversified CommunicationsMagazineMiniPlusrouteONE
Share This Article
Facebook LinkedIn Threads Email Copy Link
Previous Article A2B takes on two Whippet routes
Next Article ‘Truly shocking’
- Advertisement -

Latest News

Stagecoach’s zero-emission depot in Stockton: Blueprint for the group’s transition?
News
Coaches make a major contribution to the economy – and that should be recognised
National Coach Week: A chance to make a political case
Opinion
Five destinations added to CPT Coach Friendly list during National Coach Week
Five destinations named ‘Coach Friendly’ in National Coach Week
Coach
UKCOA initiative supports the fight against terrorism
UKCOA links with security agency in fight against terrorism
Coach
- Advertisement -
-

routeone magazine is the indispensable resource for professional UK coach, bus and minibus operators. The home of vehicle sales and the latest bus and coach job vacancies, routeone connects professional PCV operators with complete and unrivalled news coverage.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • GDPR Policy
  • Sustainability
  • Advertise
  • Latest Issue
  • Share Your News
routeonerouteone
Follow US
© 2024 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd