By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.
Accept
routeonerouteonerouteone
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo 2024
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • Livery Competition
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Search
© 2024 routeone News. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: DRT: It’s no panacea, even where bus usage is low
Share
Font ResizerAa
routeonerouteone
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo 2024
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • Livery Competition
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Follow US
© 2024 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd
- Advertisement -
-
routeone > Bus > DRT: It’s no panacea, even where bus usage is low
BusDemand Responsive TransportOperatorsOpinion

DRT: It’s no panacea, even where bus usage is low

Adam Keen
Adam Keen
Published: January 23, 2023
Share
DRT is no panacea for low usage bus services, says Adam Keen
SHARE

There has been no shortage of coverage in the trade press over the last few years of various demand responsive transport (DRT) schemes. They range from single-vehicle operations in remote parts of the country to multi-vehicle networks covering entire towns.

It is now widely accepted that DRT is not commercially sustainable without subsidy and therefore, these schemes tend to replace traditional Section 63 bus services.

In terms of investment, a new, high-quality, PSVAR compliant DRT minibus with 16 seats now costs around six figures. The days of investing in minibuses for very low sums of money are over, and while a DRT minibus will be around 40% cheaper than the equivalent new short-wheelbase bus, it is still very expensive.

Naturally, there is a fuel saving as a result of both the reduced vehicle weight and because the DRT vehicle only runs when needed, rather than operating unnecessary scheduled mileage. There is, therefore, an environmental argument for DRT, but only if it’s carrying a reasonable number of users.

Part of the appeal of DRT to a potential passenger ought to be the convenience of summoning a bus when you want one, rather than planning around a timetable. I believe that a large proportion of people quite like the certainty of a fixed timetable. Certainly, I have heard of experiences of operators being involved in DRT schemes that resulted in patronage decline when DRT replaced a fixed timetable.

However, anyone who has used Uber will know that the convenience of booking a taxi and watching it make its way to you on a smartphone is very desirable. There is a lot to be said for knowing who is turning up, what vehicle they will be in, how far away they are and when you need to leave to minimise your dwell time.

If normal financial metrics are used to assess its performance, Uber is not profitable, despite its convenience and accessibility. That gives a firm indication of why DRT hasn’t made it to commercial viability either. Does anyone know of a commercially sustainable, open-door DRT scheme in the UK that does not require any third-party subsidy? I couldn’t think of one at the time of writing.

DRT is no panacea for low usage bus services
DRT has a place, but even when deployed in rural locations that should be done so with care lest a fixed-route bus service return in the future

There is another, much more significant concern with converting a Section 63 bus contract to DRT.

The potential financial deficit for the operator is generally protected by a subsidy. But what has no protection is the very real risk that the passengers who are lost when converting a bus service to DRT may never return to the bus if it is eventually put back to how it was before.

It is admirable that operators should try new things in this fast-changing world, but many people’s experience of DRT has been that patronage has fallen and not recovered subsequently. This is all the more prominent when the prior customer base is made up of elderly travellers, who do not enjoy using technology as much as younger people.

I remember an article not so long ago which made clear that research had identified the desire of young people to book as bus as easily as ordering a pizza. That is not the case with all elderly users, so perhaps effort needs to be concentrated equally on attracting new younger passengers to DRT, rather than just helping existing customers to use the technology.

As an operator, you do not have to make too many consecutive mistakes to lose passengers and never see them again.

DRT has its place in some rural communities and maybe even in some built-up areas with historically poor public transport. But as a direct replacement for a scheduled service, unless it connects with a very good ‘main road’ fast bus route that serves large urban hubs, the introduction of DRT is deeply questionable.

Share This Article
Facebook LinkedIn Threads Email Copy Link
ByAdam Keen
Managing Director, Adventure Travel
Previous Article IRTE Skills Challenge IRTE Skills Challenge 2023 contenders: Are you ready?
Next Article Temporary O-Licence reduction after bridge strike for Atlantic Travel
- Advertisement -

Latest News

Temsa HD12 and HD13 delivered to Cresta Coaches under Asset Alliance rental deal
Temsa pair join Cresta Coaches on Asset Alliance rental agreement
Deliveries
Go-Ahead London – Managing Director
Careers Jobs
andy burnham tfgm £15.6 billion (1) The funding announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves today (4 June) has been allocated to several combined mayoral authorities to use on rail, tram, road and bus infrastructure. Transport for Greater Manchester revealed today that part of the £2.5 billion it will receive will go towards making the Bee Network fully battery-electric by 2030. An as-yet undecided portion of that will support a planned investment in 1,000 new zero-emission buses over that period, the mayoral authority said. That is part of plans to build the UK's "first fully integrated, zero-emission public transport system", with trams and trains also set to benefit. Liverpool City Region's already announced BRT system is among the projects to which its £1.6 billion will be allocated. Under those plans - due for realisation by 2028 - a high-speed network will be served by articulated buses which are modelled on the 'Glider' in Belfast. It is due to link Liverpool city centre with John Lennon Airport, and Liverpool FC and Everton FC's respective stadia along three routes. Although the model of bus has not been confirmed, a Van Hool Exqui.City on loan from Belfast was last year used as a demonstrator. That 18m vehicle can accommodate around 30% more passengers than a typical bus and has three sets of double doors. The funding will also go towards buses elsewhere in the city as the region heads towards franchising services by 2027. Liverpool Mayor Steve Rotheram with a 'Glider' which was on loan from Belfast last year - an example of the sort of bus which could serve the new BRT Bus services in the East Midlands region will be boosted by the funding, thanks to the £2 billion handed to it today by the government. Some of that allocation will be used for a rapid transit network on the Trent Arc between Nottingham and Derby. Between the two cities, the Freeport, Infinity Park Investment Zone and Ratcliffe-on-Soar will also benefit from the improved bus services. South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority's newly announced commitment towards bus franchising has been boosted by £350 million in funding as part of that region's allocation. The funding for West Yorkshire will help build new bus stations in Bradford and Wakefield. Likewise, the Tees Valley Mayoral Authority will put its sum towards a new £15 million bus station in Middlesbrough. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander says: "Today marks a watershed moment on our journey to improving transport across the North and Midlands – opening up access to jobs, growing the economy and driving up quality of life as we deliver our Plan for Change. "For too long, people in the North and Midlands have been locked out of the investment they deserve. With £15.6bn of government investment, we’re giving local leaders the means to drive cities, towns and communities forward, investing in Britain’s renewal so you and your family are better off."
TfGM’s all-electric bus plan boosted by new £15.6 billion package
News
Local Transport Minister opens First Bus electric depot in Hengrove
Local Transport Minister opens First Bus electric depot in Hengrove
Bus
- Advertisement -
-

routeone magazine is the indispensable resource for professional UK coach, bus and minibus operators. The home of vehicle sales and the latest bus and coach job vacancies, routeone connects professional PCV operators with complete and unrivalled news coverage.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • GDPR Policy
  • Sustainability
  • Advertise
  • Latest Issue
  • Share Your News
routeonerouteone
Follow US
© 2024 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd