By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.
Accept
routeonerouteonerouteone
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo 2024
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • Livery Competition
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Search
© 2024 routeone News. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Multi-operator bus ticketing: A political, not technical, issue?
Share
Font ResizerAa
routeonerouteone
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • News
    • Show all
    • Awards & Events
    • Deliveries
    • Environment
    • Exhibitor News
    • Euro Bus Expo 2024
    • Features
    • Legal
    • Minibus and minicoach
    • Operators
    • Opinion
    • People
    • Suppliers
    • Vehicles
  • Vehicles
    • Find a Vehicle
    • ZEV Comparison Tool
    • Sell a Vehicle
    • Vehicle Seller Dashboard
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Events
    • British Tourism & Travel Show
    • Euro Bus Expo
    • Innovation Challenge
    • Livery Competition
    • routeone Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
    • Share your news
    • Subscribe
    • Update Subscription Details
  • Latest Issue
  • SIGN UP
Follow US
© 2024 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd
- Advertisement -
-
routeone > Features > Multi-operator bus ticketing: A political, not technical, issue?
Features

Multi-operator bus ticketing: A political, not technical, issue?

Alex Crawford
Alex Crawford
Published: September 18, 2023
Share
SHARE

We take a look at the challenges and opportunities that lie on the road to integration for multimodal, multi-operator bus ticketing 

In 2019, the announcement of the National Bus Strategy for England set out aspirations for ‘turn up and go’ services, feeder networks, and integration not just between bus operators but with other transport modes. 

Contents
A commercial case Political barriers Success requires buy-in 

Beneath that are commercial and operational challenges that must be tackled to make collaboration not just necessary, but attractive, in a world where private companies have long held autonomy over decision-making.  

We examine areas where interconnection has been rolled out successfully, what it took to make it work, and what comes next for connected services. 

A commercial case 

A lack of incentive for shared ticketing prior to the National Bus Strategy does not mean operators had not sought it out before. In many cases, schemes have already been developed by operators.  

Robert Montgomery, former UK Managing Director Bus for Stagecoach, gave a presentation at the UK Bus Summit on 12 February 2015 on how multi-operator smart ticketing could be delivered commercially in partnership between operators and local authorities in all nine city regions in England.  

The summit came at the point when smart ticketing was just being rolled out within the industry, a moment of rapid change for operators. It gained momentum after government support saw distribution of funding to local authorities for the pursuance of such schemes. However, major operators were already looking to smart ticketing, and Robert notes the problems that the involvement of local authorities brought.  

“Some weren’t big enough to handle it,” he says. “Some weren’t interested. And some seemingly wanted to change the whole world with their schemes. In parallel with that, operators were beginning to deploy smart tickets themselves. It got messy.” 

Robert highlights that the high number of transport authorities in England complicated efforts of interconnectivity, so operators took the lead instead.  

Oxford provided the fertile ground for such schemes to take off. The local authority brokered an agreement for more joint services between Stagecoach and Go-Ahead. At the heart of that was a desire for one travel card and one weekly ticket that could be used between operators. “That was the beginning of something,” explains Robert. “Representatives from Go-Ahead and Stagecoach sat in a room, both with their own smartcard systems and both on the ITSO standard, and asked how to make those tickets interchangeable in order to develop a joint ticketing scheme in Oxford.” 

Beyond that, a desire emerged for a multi-operator smartcard in Tyne and Wear, which involved Go-Ahead, Stagecoach and Arriva. The same exercise done in Oxford was applied to Tyne and Wear. Merseyside came next, with Arriva and Stagecoach. Work was done to integrate a smartcard system for the city’s rail requirements into Arriva and Stagecoach’s systems to create an interconnected Merseyside scheme.  

Similar exercises followed in Sheffield and in Manchester. The latter demonstrated how smaller operators could get on board with such schemes, too. “We said to Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) that we had no problem with having all operators in the scheme,” says Robert. “The real blockage was that they didn’t have their own cards or facility.  

“We agreed with TfGM that if it wanted to provide any small operator in Manchester with smart ticketing equipment, we wouldn’t object, within reason. It was in our interest, as well, to have multi-operator shared ticketing. We would also send our engineers to ensure the machines communicated if they didn’t work properly to make it as easy as possible for smaller operators.” 

In those schemes, when it came to fare apportionment, each operator had its own weekly ticket. In roundabout terms, if a single-operator ticket price was set at £9, it was agreed to add an additional pound premium to make that ticket a multi-operator ticket, giving access to any operator.  

Revenue sharing from that had two elements. The first was the cost to retail, through provision of cards and other costs incurred, where a payment was given from the scheme to cover that retail cost. The rest of the revenue was then shared between the operators based on travel – generally by journey.  

“In an urban area of that sort, that was OK,” Robert says. “The average fare for a journey in Manchester, Leeds or Sheffield doesn’t vary hugely by distance – they tend to home in on the same kind of value as a cash transaction – so simply taking the revenue and spreading it was broadly accurate, backed up by surveys.” 

What this exercise established was that technology was not a barrier to such smart ticketing schemes – the barrier in any multi-operator scheme had been around commercials and politics.  

“All those schemes happened, and happened very quickly,” says Robert. “There had been very little progress when it was all down to local authorities. Ticketing expertise wasn’t their core skill – it was ours. We were able, as operators, to make it work far better.” 

Political barriers 

In South Yorkshire, where Stagecoach operates both the Supertram system and a significant portion of the bus network, integrated ticketing was successfully implemented. Not only did it produce a single-operator, multimodal ticket – allowing seamless travel between a Stagecoach tram in Sheffield and a bus – it also worked in conjunction with TravelMaster, the local authority scheme, to include multiple bus operators in the initiative.  

However, efforts to integrate the Manchester Metrolink tram system with bus schemes faced a more turbulent path. Political and revenue-driven concerns led TfGM to resist incorporating Metrolink into a multimodal scheme that mirrored bus fares, given the hefty government grants it had received for Metrolink. 

That landscape has shifted in recent years, with multimodal bus and tram tickets being available prior to the launch of the Bee Network, albeit at a premium. As Robert emphasises, the technology required for this integrated approach is available. But the true challenge remains in navigating political and commercial landscapes. 

Robert recalls efforts between 2015-2016 by the five major bus groups to bring contactless capped ticketing to all the UK’s major cities. These efforts, ambitious in their scope, resulted in informal government consent. Proposed was a criterion that only buses equipped with contactless systems would be permitted to operate registered services. A target date was set for 2022, to coincide with the expiry of existing smart ticketing technology, to make a transition easier. However, despite the groundwork and potential, politics intervened. 

Efforts to merge those plans with work on similar initiatives being undertaken concurrently by Transport for the North (TfN) stagnated. Robert notes that the complications of blending a national proposal with one funded for a specific region led to an impasse.  

“TfN had government money to fund what it was doing, and trying to get to the stage where that money could be used for a national scheme, and not just for a northern scheme, led to it all getting bogged down.” 

Success requires buy-in 

In other areas, partnership between local authorities and operators has been lauded as a great success. Leicester City Council is one example which has been vocal about its wins on Enhanced Partnership (EP) aims, as well as patronage recovery on its bus services.  

Leicester has one of the first multi-operator tap on, tap off (TOTO) ticketing scheme. Other areas with multi-operator capping only use single fare scales.  

TOTO is only one variant of broader ambitions of multi-operator ticketing. A range of tools and different product types make up variants of a flexi ticketing scheme that has existed several years in Leicester (revenue stayed where it fell on those original paper-based multi-operator tickets, with no apportionment – a limit of the technology at that time). The single zone scheme now allows customers to buy multi-operator tickets in advance, on bus or through mobile phone applications, or using TOTO, where the flexi price is charged retrospectively. 

That money goes into a single trips data and revenue pot. Graduated fares in Leicester mean flexi tickets bought in advance are valued at the same amount, while tapping in and tapping out is required, adding up trips on different fares until it reaches a single-operator cap.  

For TOTO, single-operator capping is combined with multi-operator capping on the same platform. Each trip is valued at the cost of that journey until it adds up to a cap. When it hits the single-operator cap, that revenue is distributed to the operator concerned to be divided out internally how it feels appropriate. When the revenue meets the multi-operator cap (where trips are then valued at the same amount), the money is sent to the multi-operator pot, and distributed pro-rata by the number of trips.  

“TOTO is a different system because it works out fares according to what operator/distance is made all the way through the day and the week, so if you only travel on one operator on a given day, it will work out what the best fare is for that operator,” says Andrew Gibbons, Programme Manager (Buses) Transport Strategy and Programmes at Leicester City Council.  

Leicester had the advantage of an existing flexi scheme and the process of collecting in data on usage and money on a record basis, where money and usage is pooled and reconciled every quarter based on what each operator is owed according to proportionate trips given by usage data. Each keeps its own revenue to the point of operational matters, but operators are invoiced if they owe money into the closed pot. Those operators that owe money pay it to the council, which then pays it forward to operators that are owed money.  

“We got the trust of the operators that we were doing it properly,” explains Andrew. “We’ve got a clearance and revenue reimbursement system in place and a legal agreement that everyone was happy with. We’d already expanded the number of flexi products and the different platforms you can get on mobile phone as well as on the bus, and we’d already got it on smartcard at the time. We also increased the range so that it included student, child and adult.

In 2019 we agreed a roadmap based on different milestones, and with all the various aims – to try and speed boarding times, improve integration, get more people using buses to non-central workplaces – we came up with a roadmap which was three bits, firstly to expand the flexi range. The second stage was for each operator to introduce TOTO single-operator capping, and the third stage was to introduce multi-operator capping. For that we got funds via the Transforming Cities Fund.” 

The advent of the operator-led Project Coral is what saw the scheme trialled at Leicester, and it was thanks to existing homologation of payment service providers that it was rolled out more easily. The Project managed the introduction of the multi-operator TOTO capping, with the process completed during the pandemic. A more robust IT system is being developed under Project Coral to broaden the scheme nationally. That same platform will help also, it is expected, integrate rail.  

David Brookes, Commercial and Operations Director at Centrebus, one of the parties involved in the Leicester EP scheme, notes how it was the good organisation of Project Coral and the cooperation of all parties involved that helped to make the scheme a reality. He says it would have been a challenge to achieve something of this scale without the buy-in of those multiple stakeholders.  

“It’s a complex project to deliver and, as an independent, it would be difficult to be able to deliver it without something like Project Coral being involved,” he says. “For multi-operator, you do need somebody to head the project – you have to bring all those different parties together. It went well, and I think that is testament to how well it was organised.” 

Integration with other modes will be “horses for courses”, according to David, and will rely largely on the engagement of local authorities and operators. 

Bijel Mistry, Transport Development Officer (Programmes) at Leicester City Council, notes how usage on the network has since trebled, while revenue has doubled. “That’s why operators are continuing to pursue it,” she says. “Operators have seen the benefits themselves; they’re getting the increased revenue and trips through it. 

“The operators are very committed and driven, and want to put that effort in to making it work. That’s made a massive difference in having us having this successful multi-operator scheme.” 

 

TAGGED:multimodalticketing
Share This Article
Facebook LinkedIn Threads Email Copy Link
ByAlex Crawford
Journalist, routeone
Previous Article Glen Valley Glen Valley Tours: ‘Can I cut a hole in the side of it?’
Next Article ballot box Transport policy on the countdown to the general election
- Advertisement -

Latest News

Temsa HD12 and HD13 delivered to Cresta Coaches under Asset Alliance rental deal
Temsa pair join Cresta Coaches on Asset Alliance rental agreement
Deliveries
Go-Ahead London – Managing Director
Careers Jobs
andy burnham tfgm £15.6 billion (1) The funding announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves today (4 June) has been allocated to several combined mayoral authorities to use on rail, tram, road and bus infrastructure. Transport for Greater Manchester revealed today that part of the £2.5 billion it will receive will go towards making the Bee Network fully battery-electric by 2030. An as-yet undecided portion of that will support a planned investment in 1,000 new zero-emission buses over that period, the mayoral authority said. That is part of plans to build the UK's "first fully integrated, zero-emission public transport system", with trams and trains also set to benefit. Liverpool City Region's already announced BRT system is among the projects to which its £1.6 billion will be allocated. Under those plans - due for realisation by 2028 - a high-speed network will be served by articulated buses which are modelled on the 'Glider' in Belfast. It is due to link Liverpool city centre with John Lennon Airport, and Liverpool FC and Everton FC's respective stadia along three routes. Although the model of bus has not been confirmed, a Van Hool Exqui.City on loan from Belfast was last year used as a demonstrator. That 18m vehicle can accommodate around 30% more passengers than a typical bus and has three sets of double doors. The funding will also go towards buses elsewhere in the city as the region heads towards franchising services by 2027. Liverpool Mayor Steve Rotheram with a 'Glider' which was on loan from Belfast last year - an example of the sort of bus which could serve the new BRT Bus services in the East Midlands region will be boosted by the funding, thanks to the £2 billion handed to it today by the government. Some of that allocation will be used for a rapid transit network on the Trent Arc between Nottingham and Derby. Between the two cities, the Freeport, Infinity Park Investment Zone and Ratcliffe-on-Soar will also benefit from the improved bus services. South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority's newly announced commitment towards bus franchising has been boosted by £350 million in funding as part of that region's allocation. The funding for West Yorkshire will help build new bus stations in Bradford and Wakefield. Likewise, the Tees Valley Mayoral Authority will put its sum towards a new £15 million bus station in Middlesbrough. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander says: "Today marks a watershed moment on our journey to improving transport across the North and Midlands – opening up access to jobs, growing the economy and driving up quality of life as we deliver our Plan for Change. "For too long, people in the North and Midlands have been locked out of the investment they deserve. With £15.6bn of government investment, we’re giving local leaders the means to drive cities, towns and communities forward, investing in Britain’s renewal so you and your family are better off."
TfGM’s all-electric bus plan boosted by new £15.6 billion package
News
Local Transport Minister opens First Bus electric depot in Hengrove
Local Transport Minister opens First Bus electric depot in Hengrove
Bus
- Advertisement -
-

routeone magazine is the indispensable resource for professional UK coach, bus and minibus operators. The home of vehicle sales and the latest bus and coach job vacancies, routeone connects professional PCV operators with complete and unrivalled news coverage.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • GDPR Policy
  • Sustainability
  • Advertise
  • Latest Issue
  • Share Your News
routeonerouteone
Follow US
© 2024 routeone News | Powered by Diversified Business Communications UK Ltd